Money Creation in Peace & War – A Warning from Russell Napier

27th November, 2025

In his October 2025 lecture, financial historian Russell Napier has offered one of the clearest explanations of how money truly works, and why the system that has sustained modern prosperity is now approaching a historic turning point.

His argument traces the evolution of money from metallic roots to the intangible world of bank credit, revealing how governments have come to dominate the process of money creation, and why inflation has re-emerged as the unavoidable consequence of this dominance.

Napier’s analysis aligns closely with the core insights of the Austrian School of economics – that money is not merely a tool of policy but the moral foundation of a free society. The story he tells is both a history and a warning, a reminder that the stability of money is inseparable from the character of those who issue it.

From Silver to Credit: The Evolution of Trust

For most of recorded history, money was metal. A silver coin was wealth incarnate, a commodity money, not a promise or a claim but the thing itself. When you held a coin, you held value. Its worth did not depend on the solvency of a bank or the decree of a government.

But as trade expanded, carrying metal became impractical. Merchants began to use receipts and bills of exchange, paper instruments representing claims on stored coin. Over time, people accepted those receipts as representative money. Then the link between currency and metal loosened further, and then it vanished altogether with the introduction of fiat money.

Napier describes this as a transfer of trust: first from tangible value to financial intermediaries, and finally to the state. What began as a convenience became a revolution in the nature of money. Banks no longer merely stored value, they created it. When a bank extends a loan, it credits the borrower’s account with new deposits, effectively manufacturing money from nothing more than a promise to repay.

The Austrian critique begins here. Credit, detached from prior saving, is not new wealth; it is a claim on future production. When multiplied across an entire system, such credit creation inflates the money supply beyond real economic capacity. Prices rise, distortions multiply, and the cycle of boom and bust begins.

Napier’s historical tour of this transformation is masterful. What he presents as a pragmatic evolution of finance, the Austrian economist sees as the beginning of a subtle moral hazard – the replacement of value with confidence, and of discipline with leverage.

The Hidden Hand of the State

Napier argues that the modern banking system, though nominally private, functions as an arm of the state. Central banks set the price of credit; governments guarantee deposits; regulators determine what kinds of loans qualify as “safe.”

In wartime or crisis, this relationship becomes explicit. Governments direct banks to lend to specific sectors or projects, effectively commandeering the credit system to finance policy objectives. Banks, cushioned by guarantees, comply.

This is not socialism in its traditional sense. Ownership remains private, but control is public. Through regulation and moral suasion, states have discovered how to command credit without owning capital.

Napier views this as the key feature of our time: the rise of “directed credit,” where money creation serves political priorities rather than market signals. He warns that such systems always lead to inflation, because they replace the discipline of interest rates and savings with bureaucratic goals.

The Austrian agrees – and adds that this arrangement corrupts price signals, misallocates resources, and eventually erodes the credibility of money itself. The problem is not simply inefficiency but deception: the pretense that wealth can be willed into existence through policy.

Money, Credit, and the Cycle of Inflation

Modern inflation is often misunderstood as the product of “printing money.” In truth, as Napier explains, most new money enters the economy through credit expansion, not through the literal printing press. When banks extend loans, they simultaneously create deposits. These deposits circulate as money, and when confidence is high, the process accelerates.

In normal times, this mechanism is self-correcting. When too much credit is created, defaults rise, lending tightens, and the system rebalances. But when governments underwrite the system (guaranteeing deposits, rescuing banks, and manipulating rates) this correction is suspended. The discipline of loss disappears.

The end result – price inflation

Napier’s insight here is historical rather than purely theoretical. He reminds us that inflation is rarely the deliberate aim of policy; it is the by-product of fear – fear of defaults, unemployment, and political backlash. Once debt levels become too high, no democratic government will tolerate the deflation needed to restore balance. Inflation becomes the path of least resistance, the unspoken default of the modern state.

From an Austrian standpoint, this logic is tragically self-reinforcing. Every intervention to suppress pain today increases the instability of tomorrow. Inflation is not an act of fate but a moral failure of courage, it is the refusal to accept short-term loss in exchange for long-term health.

The Social Cost of Inflation

Napier’s historical lens extends beyond economics. He draws on Weimar Germany’s hyperinflation to show how monetary collapse destroys not only savings but the moral fabric of society. When money dies, the link between work and reward disintegrates. Contracts lose meaning. Trust evaporates.

He quotes the Weimar experience to illustrate how inflation turns society upside down: the prudent become poor, the indebted prosper, and speculation replaces production.

The Austrian economist cannot help but echo this moral dimension. Inflation is not merely an economic ailment; it is a redistribution of virtue. It punishes thrift, rewards recklessness, and corrodes the social foundations of freedom. Hayek and Mises both warned that monetary debasement is the prelude to political decay. Once voters learn that government can conjure purchasing power from nothing, they will demand that it do so forever i.e., they will continually express their demand for "free stuff" at the ballot box.

The Euro and the Fragility of Modern Monetary Unions

Napier’s treatment of the euro is a particularly striking example of monetary evolution and decay. The single currency was launched in 1999 under German stewardship, backed implicitly by that country’s conservative credit culture. Today, he notes, it is sustained largely by the balance sheets of heavily indebted states such as France and Italy.

This quiet transformation, from a discipline of restraint to a system of accommodation, mirrors the global pattern. What began as a promise of stability has become an exercise in mutual dependence i.e., a monetary system where no participant can afford the others’ failure.

From the Austrian perspective, this was always inevitable. A currency without a sovereign people or unified fiscal policy cannot enforce discipline. When the next crisis arrives, Napier predicts, the European Central Bank will likely respond not with reform but with control i.e., capital restrictions, asset purchase mandates, and further politicization of credit.

Such measures may preserve the currency’s appearance, but at the cost of its liberty. The euro, like all politicized money, survives by substituting coercion for confidence.

Lessons from Wartime Money

Napier’s history of wartime finance underscores a recurring truth, that when the survival of the state is at stake, monetary discipline is the first casualty. During major wars, governments routinely force banks to lend, cap interest rates, and inflate away their debts.

Britain, he notes, managed its wartime finances through borrowing and moral suasion, while German monetary policy resorted to the printing press, with disastrous consequences. Yet even Britain’s “prudence” relied on mechanisms that ultimately debased the pound in real terms.

The Austrian lesson here is clear: every war fought on borrowed or printed money is financed not by today’s taxpayers but by tomorrow’s victims of inflation. Debt-financed war is the economic equivalent of conscription across generations.

Napier’s broader point is that this pattern does not end with peace. Once a state learns it can manage crises through credit creation, it will use the same tools for every political emergency thereafter. Monetary exceptionalism becomes permanent policy.

The Counterfeit Parallel

Among Napier’s most vivid illustrations is the Nazi plot to destroy Britain’s currency through mass counterfeiting. The goal was to produce enough fake banknotes to flood the market and undermine public trust.

The plan ultimately failed, but its symbolism lingers. As Napier implies, the danger today is not criminal counterfeiting but official counterfeiting i.e., the institutionalized creation of money unbacked by value. Central banks, in their zeal to sustain growth and prevent collapse, have assumed the role once reserved for forgers by issuing promises that cannot all be redeemed.

The difference, of course, is legality. The effect on purchasing power is the same. The Austrian insight here is blunt – that every expansion of unbacked credit is a theft of value from existing holders of money. Inflation is counterfeiting by another name.

Debt, Leverage, and the Return of Inflation

Napier’s conclusion is stark. The world is more indebted today than at any time in recorded history. Public and private balance sheets alike are bloated, and even nations once synonymous with stability now rely on vast leverage to sustain living standards.

Under such conditions, raising interest rates to contain inflation is politically and financially impossible. Default is intolerable. The only viable escape, he argues, is controlled inflation, a slow erosion of debt through rising prices.

In the short run, this strategy preserves stability. In the long run, it guarantees the debasement of money. Napier cautions that the same logic applies even to the most disciplined economies. “This is not your father’s Switzerland,” he remarks. Once a paragon of restraint, Switzerland now carries heavy private-sector debt and bears the implicit burden of its vast banking system.

Despite capital inflows and a strong currency, even the Swiss franc may not retain its traditional role as a safe haven. The pressures of global leverage are universal. No nation, however prudent, can escape the gravitational pull of systemic debt.

From an Austrian perspective, this is the heart of the matter. Inflation is not a technical choice; it is the final consequence of decades of accumulated error. A civilization built on perpetual credit expansion must, eventually, pay its bill – either through liquidation or through the silent confiscation of purchasing power.

The Fragile Covenant of Money

Napier’s narrative, read through an Austrian lens, becomes more than a financial chronicle. It is a meditation on trust, responsibility, and moral order. Money is not merely an accounting system; it is the shared covenant of a society that agrees to measure value honestly.

When that covenant is broken, when governments create promises faster than the economy can fulfill them, the resulting inflation is not just a rise in prices but a fall in truth.

Napier concludes, and rightly so, that inflation is the natural endgame of our debt-laden world. But the Austrian economist must go further: inflation is not only the consequence of debt but its enabler. It is the lubricant of fiscal irresponsibility, the silent partner of political excess.

Sound money, by contrast, imposes discipline. It limits ambition, restrains war, and demands that consumption follow production. It is, in that sense, the foundation of liberty itself.

Conclusion: What the Future Demands

Russell Napier’s analysis is a profound contribution to the understanding of modern money. His historical depth and institutional clarity make him one of the few thinkers able to connect the abstractions of finance with the realities of politics. His conclusion, that inflation is inevitable, is a reflection of how far we have strayed from the principles of sound money and limited government.

The Austrian lesson is ultimately one of moral choice. We cannot abolish the laws of economics, only postpone their verdict. A society that lives beyond its means will always face the reckoning, whether through crisis, default, or inflation.

Napier warns that the first casualty of war is price stability. The deeper truth is that the first casualty of inflation is freedom. And when freedom goes, money follows, not just as a medium of exchange, but as the mirror of civilization’s own honesty.

The coming inflation does indeed look like the inevitable next step, it is the ‘path of least resistance’ that our political elites will choose, and they will undoubtedly blame anyone and everyone else for the consequences of their choice. The remaining question relates to what comes after the coming economic crisis; as a society do we return to sound money or do which lurch even deeper into the abyss of ever greater state control? Only time will tell.

Sources: